AUTHORS: Andres Franco-Almazan, Nicole Fernandez-Soriano, Sergio Vidal-Beltrán
Download as PDF
ABSTRACT: Today, we are witnessing an increase in the number of services and applications demanded by users and it presents a challenge for traditional networks in terms of implementation, costs and operation. Softwaredefined networks emerge as an agile, flexible and programmable architecture, which places it as a solution in the implementation of network applications and services. This paper presents a comparison between the performance of traditional networks and Software-defined networks applying tests to evaluate the parameters defined by the RFC 2544 methodology, in order to obtain a complete characterization of each scheme using a proposed topology applied to each technology, after that we analyze the performance of each one and examining its advantages and disadvantages. Currently, Software-defined networks and virtualization are a subject of many researches, as they are considered essential to counteract the increase in complexity and costs of managing and operating traditional networks.
KEYWORDS: software-defined network, virtualization, OpenFlow, Opendaylight, Mininet
REFERENCES:
[
1]. International Telecommunication Union,
“Setting the scene for 5G: opportunities and
challenges”.
[Online] Available:
https://www.itu.int/net4/ITUT/registration/Resolver/Index?handle_id=11.1002
/pub/811d7a5f-en
[2] D. King, C. Rotsos, A. Aguado, N. Georgalas and
V. Lopez, 'The Software Defined Transport
Network: Fundamentals, findings and
futures,' 2016 18th International Conference on
Transparent Optical Networks (ICTON), Trento,
2016, pp. 1-4.
[Online]. doi:
10.1109/ICTON.2016.7550669
[3] M. S. Olimjonovich, 'Software Defined
Networking: Management of network resources
and data flow,' 2016 International Conference on
Information Science and Communications
Technologies (ICISCT), Tashkent, 2016, pp. 1-3.
[Online]. doi: 10.1109/ICISCT.2016.7777384
[4] V. Gupta, K. Kaur and S. Kaur, 'Network
programmability using software defined
networking' 2016 3rd International Conference
on Computing for Sustainable Global
Development (INDIACom), New Delhi, 2016, pp.
1170-1173.
[5] A. Srikanth, P. Varalakshmi, V. Somasundaram
and P. Ravichandiran, 'Congestion Control
Mechanism in Software Defined Networking by
Traffic Rerouting' 2018 Second International
Conference on Computing Methodologies and
Communication (ICCMC), Erode, 2018, pp. 55-
58.
[Online]. doi: 10.1109/ICCMC.2018.8488041
[6] Citrix, “SDN 101: An introduction to software
defined Networking”.
[Online] Available:
https://www.citrix.com/content/dam/citrix/en_us
/documents/oth/sdn-101-an-introduction-tosoftware-defined-networking-en.
[7] VMware, «Virtualization Overview» 2006.
[Online]. Available:
https://www.vmware.com/pdf/virtualization.pdf
[8] P. K. D. S. S. J. Haleplidis E, “Software-Defined
Networking (SDN): Layers and Architecture
Terminology”. Patent RFC 7426, January 2015.
[9] Cisco, «OpenDaylight OpenFlow Manager
(OFM) App» CiscoDevNet,
[Online].Available:
https://developer.cisco.com/codeexchange/github/
repo/ CiscoDevNet/OpenDaylight-Openflow-App/
[10] The Linux Foundation Project, «Lithium: The
new release,» Opendaylight Project, 2015.
[Online]. Available:
https://www.opendaylight.org/what-wedo/current-release/lithium.
[11] V. Padma, P. Yogesh, “Proactive Failure
Recovery in OpenFlow Based Software Defined
Networks “in 3rd International Conference on
Signal Processing, Communication and
Networking (ICSCN),2015,
[Online]. doi:
10.1109/ICSCN.2015.7219846
[12] Mininet Team, «An Instant Virtual Network on
your Laptop (or other
PC)»Mininet,2015.
[Online].Available:
http://mininet.org/
[13] S. Bradner, J. McQuaid” Benchmarking
Methodology for Network Interconnect Devices”.
Patent RFC 2544, March 1999
[14] S. Bradner, J. McQuaid,” Benchmarking
Terminology for Network Interconnection
Devices”. Patent RFC 1242, July 1991.
[15] Cisco, «Understanding Jitter in Packet Voice
Networks(Cisco IOS
Platforms)»
[Online].Available:https://www.cisco.
com/c/en/us/support/docs/voice/voicequality/18902-jitter-packet-voice.html