AUTHORS: S. Gerassis, Á. Saavedra, Julio F. García, José E. Martín, Javier Taboada

Download as PDF

ABSTRACT: Tunnel construction is affected from its origins by different types of uncertainties responsible for innumerable safety risks. This problem has been addressed constantly during the last times achieving positive results, but the complex work scenarios and the common variability of the construction processes prevent putting an end to this problem. For this reason, this study presents an alternative methodology for safety prioritization in tunnel construction gaining relevant information hitherto unknown which can be crucial for policy making in infrastructure projects. The method proposed consists on the Bayesian analysis of data from occupational accidents recorded during the construction of tunnels in the last years. For this purpose, the model variables are rigorously estimated from expert judgement supported by the analysis of data from previous projects. Once the bayesian model is built, the dependencies among the variables are examined using the mutual information. The results obtained from the mutual information analysis allow to detect the main risks responsible for the occurrence of accidents and how they interact. Afterwards, a simplified Bayesian model with the most relevant risk factors affecting safety is built. Through the bayesian inference process, this condensed and validated model facilitates the exploration of significant contributions for safety policy decisions in tunnel construction. Overall, the results obtained provide a deep insight about the most influential factors on which should be focus the efforts to reduce accidents. Several safety risk factors are further influenced by human and organizational factors, whose effect can be reduced in advance. The mechanism of risk migration was better understood when analysing the interaction between the variables in the Bayesian model. In general, the accurate simplification of the model network demonstrated to be a powerful tool to comprehend the uncertainty associated to complex problems.

KEYWORDS: Mutual information, supervised learning, occupational accidents, decision making, safety risks

REFERENCES:

[1] K. S. Lane, Tunnels and underground excavations, Encyclopædia Britannica (2017, May 10)

[Online]. Available: https://www.britannica.com/technology/tunnel/ Future-trends-in-underground-construction

[2] B. J. Arends, S. N. Jonkman, J.K. Vrijling, P. van Gelder, Evaluation of tunnel safety: towards an economic safety optimum, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. Vol. 90, No. 2, 2005, pp.217-228.

[3] L. Zhang, X. Wu, L. Ding, M. J. Skibniewski, Y. Yan, Decision support analysis for safety control in complex project environments based on Bayesian Networks, Expert Syst. Appl. Vol. 40, 2013, pp.4273-4282.

[4] V. Carr, J. H. M. Tah, A fuzzy approach to construction project risk assessment and analysis: Construction project risk management system, Adv. Eng. Softw. Vol. 32, 2001, pp.847- 857.

[5] M. Correa, C. Bielza, J. P. Teixeira, Comparison of Bayesian networks and artificial networks for quality detection in a machining process, Expert Syst. Appl. Vol. 36, 2009, pp.7270-7279.

[6] F. Piniella, A. Fern, M. A. Ndez-Engo, Towards system for the management of safety on board artisanal fishing vessels: Proposal for checklists and their application, Saf. Sci. Vol. 47, 2009, pp.265-276.

[7] S. Gerassis, J. E. Martin, J. F. García, Á. Saavedra, J. Taboada, Bayesian decision tool for the analysis of occupational accidents in the construction of embankments, J. Constr. Eng. Manage. Vol. 143, No. 2, 2017, pp. 273-282.

[8] R. L. Sousa, H. H. Einstein, Risk analysis during tunnel construction using Bayesian networks: Porto metro case study, Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol. Vol. 27, 2012, pp.86- 100.

[9] S. Leu, C-M. Chang, Bayesian-network-based safety risk assessment for steel construction projects, Accid. Anal. Prev. Vol. 54, 2013, pp.122-133.

[10] T. M. Cover, J. A. Thomas, Elements of Information Theory. John Wiley & Sons Inc., 1991.

[11] A. M. Williamson, A-M. Feyer, Causes of accidents and the time of day, Work Stress Vol. 9, 1995, pp. 158-164.

[12] J. E. Martín, T. Rivas, J. M. Matías, J. Taboada, A. Argüelles, A Bayesian network analysis of workplace accidents caused by falls from a height, Saf. Sci. Vol.47, No.2, 2009, pp. 206-214.

[13] S. Salmien, T. Tallberg, “Human errors in fatal and serious occupational accidents in Finland,” Ergonomics. Vol. 39, 1996, pp. 980- 988.

[14] A. Oliver, A. Cheyne, J. M. Tomás, S. Cox, The effects of organizational and individual factors on occupational accidents, J. Occup. Organ. Psychol. Vol. 75, 2002, pp. 473-448.

[15] S. T. Roweis, L. K. Saul, Nonlinear dimensionality reduction by locally linear embedding, Science. Vol. 290, 2000, pp. 2323- 2326.

[16] P. M. Kuhnert, K. R. Hayes, How believable is your BBN? 18th World IMACS/MODISM Congress. Cairns, Australia, 2009.

[17] Bayesia S.A.S. BayesiaLab Software. Parc Cérès, Bâtiment Nº21, rue Ferdinand Buisson, 53810 Changé, France, 2017. http://www.bayesia.com/

[18] M. Borda, Fundamentals in Information Theory and Coding, Springer pp.11, 2011.

[19] C. E. Shannon, “A mathematical theory of communication,” Bell System Technical Journal. Vol. 27, 1948, pp.379-423.

[20] S. Conrady, L. Jouffe, Bayesian Networks & BayesiaLab - A Practical Introduction for Researches, Bayesia USA: Franklin, TN., 2015.

[21] J. Rissanen, Modeling by shortest data description, Automatica. Vol. 14, 1978, pp. 465- 658.

[22] B. D’Ambrosio, Inference in Bayesian networks, AI Magazine. Vol. 20, No. 2, 1999, pp. 22-36.

[23] J. Reason, Managing the risks of organizational accidents, Ashgate, Bookfield, VT, USA, 1997.

[24] H. Peng, F. Long, C. Ding, Feature selection based on mutual information criteria of maxdependency, max-relevance and minredundancy, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence. Vol. 27, No. 8, 2005, pp. 1226–1238.

[25] P. S. Paul, J. Maiti, The role of behaviour factors on safety management in underground mines, Saf. Sci. Vol. 45, 2007, pp.449-471.

[26] M. T. Birgonul, I. Dikmen, C. Budayan, T. Demirel, An expert system for the quantification of fault rates in construction fall accidents, Int. J. Occup. Saf. Ergon. Vol. 22, 2016, pp.20-31.

[27] S. Leitao, B. A. Greiner, Organisational safety climate and occupational accidents and injuries: an epidemiology-based systematic review, Work Stress. Vol. 30, 2016, pp.71-90.

[28] V. Gharibi, S. B. Mortazavi, A. J. Jafari, J. Malakouti, M. Bagheri, H. Abadi, The relationship between workers’ attitude towards safety and occupational accidents experience, Int. J. Occup. Hyg. Vol. 8, No. 3, 2016, pp.145- 150.

[29] J. F. García, J. E. Martín, S. Gerassis, A. Saavedra, J. Taboada García, Bayesian analysis of risk associated with workplace accidents in earthmoving operations, Informes de la Construcción, Vol. 69, No. 546, 2017.

WSEAS Transactions on Business and Economics, ISSN / E-ISSN: 1109-9526 / 2224-2899, Volume 14, 2017, Art. #24, pp. 215-224


Copyright © 2017 Author(s) retain the copyright of this article. This article is published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0