AUTHORS: Maira Kotsovoulou, Vassilia Stefanou, Despina Makri

Download as PDF

ABSTRACT: This qualitative exploratory study, based on the theoretical principles of Grounded Theory, aims to explore students’ perceptions of the utilization of learning resources in computer programming courses. The study employed an open class discussion, a survey, and semi-structured interviews for data collection. Data analysis was performed in an iterative and deductive manner, using open, selective and theoretical coding. Two coding schemes were developed from this process; one that conceptualizes the ‘reason’ and one that identifies the ‘selection criteria’. Finally, the theoretical framework that emerged outlines relationships between the reasons why, and the purposes for which, students utilize learning resources.

KEYWORDS: learning resources, exploratory study, computer programming, grounded theory, educational resources

REFERENCES:

[1] Bruner, J. (1990). Acts of meaning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

[2] Coyne, I. T. (1997). Sampling in qualitative research. Purposeful and theoretical sampling; merging or clear boundaries? Journal of Advanced Nursing (26), 623-630.

[3] Creswel, J. W. (2003). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches (2nd ed.). London: Sage Publications Ltd.

[IV] Davis, F. (1989). Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly , 12 (3), 319-340.

[4] Duffy, T. M., Lowyck, J., & Jonassen, D. H. (1993). Designing environments for constructive learning. Berlin: SpringerVerlag.

[5] Eckerdal, A. (2006). Novice Students’ Learning of Object-Oriented Programming. Uppsala University, IT Department.

[VII] Entwistle, N., & Tait, H. (1990). Approaches to Learning, Evaluations of Teaching, and Preferences for Contrasting Academic Environments. Higher Education , 19 (2), 169-194.

[6] Fowler, L., Allen, M., Armarego, J., & Mackenzie, J. (2000). Learning styles and CASE tools in Software Engineering. Teaching and Learning Forum.

[7] Gagne, E., Yekovich, C., & Yekovich, F. (1993). Cognitive psychology of school learning. New York, NY: HarperCollins.

[8] Glaser, B. (1992). Basics of Grounded Theory Analysis. Mill Valley, California: Sociology Press.

[9] Glaser, B. (1994). Theoretical Elaboration of Quantitative Data. In B. Glaser, More Gounded Theory Methodology: A Reader (pp. 197-232). Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.

[10] Glaser, B. (1978). Theoretical Sensitivity. Mill Valley, CA: Sociological Press.

[11] Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Chicago: Aldine Publishing Company.

[12] Hadjerrouit, S. (2007). A Blended Learning Model in Java Programming: A Design-Based Research Approach. Computer Science and IT Education.

[13] Jones, M. L., Kriflik, G., & Zanko, M. (2005). Grounded Theory: A theoretical and practical application in the Australian Film Industry. Retrieved from University of Wollongong: http://ro.uow.edu.au/commpapers/46

[14] Krauss, S. (2005). Research Paradigms and Meaning Making: A Primers. The Qualitative Report , 10 (4), 758-770.

[15] Lösch, A. (2003). Grounded Theory for Researching. 56, pp. 133-144. Libri.

[16] Mayers, J. T., & Fowler, C. J. (1999). Learning technology and usuability: A framework for understanding courseware. Interacting with computers (11), 485-497.

[17] McArthur, D. J., & Lewis, M. W. (1998). Untangling the Web: Applications of the Internet and Other Information Technologies to Higher Learning. Rand Corporation, The.

[18] Morse, J. M. (1991). In Qualitative Nursing Research: A Contemporary Dialogue. In Strategies for sampling. (pp. 127-145). Newburry Park, California: Sage Pubications Ltd.

[19] Parikh, M., & Verma, S. (2002). Utilizing Internet technologies to support learning : an empirical analysis. International Journal of Information Management , 22, 27-46.

[20] Robson, C. (2003). Read World: Research: A Resource for Social Scientists and Practitioner-Researchers. Offord: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.

[21] Sandelowski, M., Holditch-Davis, D., & Harris, G. B. (1992). Using qualitative and quantitative methods: the transition to parenthood of infertile couples. In In Qualitative Methods in Family Research (pp. 301-323). Newbury Park, California: Sage.

[22] Seibold, C. (2002). The place of theory and the development of a theoretical framework in a qualitative study. Qualitative Research Journal , 2, 3-15.

[23] Selvaraj, N., & Fields, B. (2009). A Grounded Theory Approach towards Conceptualizing CIS for Heterogeneous Work Communities. British HCI Group Annual Conference on People and Computers: Celebrating People and Technology (pp. 471-479). British Computer Society.

[24] Steffe, L. P., & Gale, J. (1995). Constructivism in education. New Jersey, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

[25] Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. M. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. London: Sage Pubications Ltd.

[26] Vygotsy, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

[27] Yin, R. (1994). Designing case studies. In R. Yin, Case study research: design and methods (pp. 18-53). London: Sage Pubications Ltd.